The Law Explained Series
WHERE TRUTH IS, FICTION OF LAW DOES NOT EXIST
WELCOME
Please Read and Listen Before We Begin
My goal is to fulfill a promise I’ve made to all who come here—to provide practical relief and remedies for those facing legal challenges. This isn’t about working against the law but about restoring it when trust is broken, and fiduciary agents fail in their duties.
We all have something to learn from one another. Restoring the Rule of Law in our communities requires people willing to stand up, engage, and debate. Naturally, differing views will arise—some shaped by firsthand experience, others by frustration as legal systems continue to evolve.
That’s why it’s time for a more constructive, level-headed approach. Rather than focusing on what others may be doing wrong, this blog aims to foster collaboration and a shared commitment to understanding and applying the true Rule of Law.
I hope this series contributes to that effort, bringing clarity, insight, and—over time—healing.
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW EXPLAINED
Why start with “please read and listen first?”
Before diving into the first lessons of The Law Explained, it’s essential to lay a foundation. This blog isn’t just about teaching steps and concepts—it’s about understanding key principles before applying them. That’s why we begin here, with a few important questions:
- How much have you already studied traditional legal material? Particularly in relation to Western-Roman courts, officials, and institutions?
- What is your motivation for reading and listening to this series? What are you hoping to achieve?
- What level of commitment are you willing to apply? Are you seeking genuine understanding, or just looking for quick fixes?
A Reality Check on Quick Fixes
Yes, as we progress through this series, you’ll find practical strategies that can bring immediate improvements—such as refining your approach to affidavits and learning what NOT to send or write in court-related matters. Some of these adjustments may lead to swift positive outcomes.
However, after years of studying legal systems across vast libraries, I have yet to find a single “magic cure” that solves every problem instantly. There is no shortcut to knowledge, and there is no remedy for incompetence except self-discipline and learning.
To put it bluntly: There is no “cure for stupidity” except knowledge, and no solution for incompetence without a firm commitment to self-restraint.
If you’ve spent thousands chasing empty promises of “quick cures” or acted recklessly in legal matters, you may need to undo past damage before seeing progress. If you continue down a path of desperation, recklessness, or self-destructive actions, no advice in this blog will help—until you first change your approach.
This series is for those willing to commit, learn, and apply knowledge with wisdom. If that’s you, then let’s begin.
Similarly, if you approach to learning about law is to find some way to “get rich quick” or to “exact revenge” then the following material is not for you. Yes, it is true that there exist many tricks within the present Roman system that certain people acknowledge within the system can use to gain greater advantage over others and reap riches from such patronage. But this is a heavily guarded and policed and closed system, and not available to those considered outside such patronage. Politicians have access to such tools; and the children of nobility or rich industrialists have access to many of these tools; and certain members of certain fraternities and societies have access to these tools; and certain members of the law guilds have access to these tools. But if you do not belong to one of these groups, you may not have any right or access within the Roman System to write certain writs, or demands or letters or deeds. zthe elite, you may not have the power or authority to access certain tools of law. The very fact that most of those people employed in government and positions of trust do not have the authority to directly access their accounts is borne out of the fact that even some of the most powerful people in Western-Roman Society had to gain their wealth via other means than direct access. So please, I urge you to reconsider such false promises and lies that people keep peddling of instant wealth as it is a lie even to those people within the system; and an impossibility for those who find themselves on the outer.
If, on the other hand, your motive is revenge, or to show off what you think you know, or to somehow be the “one that pulls down the system”, then I urge you to think again. Not only are such emotions and conditions of ego in opposition to the true notion of the Golden Rule of Law, it is a state of mind guaranteed to fail. There are three essential tests that any Roman Court – if it chooses to act responsibly – may apply to any behaviour or instruments or claims before it:
(1) If a party refuses to follow the procedures and forms of the court, or fails to establish the rights that they claim have been wronged, or their associated rights of action, then all such claims can be struck out, in one fell swoop, as being “without merit” and therefore frivolous; and
(2) If a party makes unsubstantiated claims, or personal attacks, or raises controversies beyond the matter at hand, or is rude to the judge or court officials, then all such claims can be struck out, in one effect, as scandalous; and
(3) If a party involves emotions, or implied subjective opinions, or conspiracy, or belligerence, or prejudice in their behavior, then all such claims can be struck out as vexatious.
Because people persistently refuse to listen to reason and take the privately created documents of thousands of people on the internet and file them in their [personal] matters without thinking, approximately 60% of all defenses, or claims by non-attorneys across the planet are being struck out on the argument of being frivolous alone. When you add the notion of scandalous and vexatious to the mix, more than 99% of all the claimed criminal or civil remedies, being filed by hundreds of thousands of people around the world from information on the internet, are failing to even be recorded, much less considered as a defense, or a claim – for being frivolous, for being scandalous, for being vexatious.
In contrast, those that did not fall for such promises and claims and went through with registered solicitors and attorneys or court offered legal assistance faired better on average as the total prosecution rates for criminal matters around the world is high, but still less than 90% and in civil matters is less than 70% success rates for the plaintiff (keeping in mind that a plaintiff in a civil matter always starts with a built-in advantage).
Let me say it another way, so hopefully it gets through: This means that for the millions of dollars that people have donated to the thousands of claimed legal experts on the internet, less than 1 in one hundred people, even get the chance to have their arguments heard. In criminal matters, they would have improved their chances ten times in most cases, if they simply accepted the court appointed attorney, or in civil cases if they simply followed the instructions on the court web sites.
No wonder so many attorneys and lawyers and judges and magistrates continue to shake their heads at why there seems to be so many stupid and gullible and insane people seemingly incapable of using common sense in their matters to find some relief or remedy.
So if your motive is some kind of revenge, or controversy then stop reading and listening now, because not only will you not find what you are looking for in this series on the Law Explained, you have already set yourself up to make matters manifestly worse for yourself.
The only true remedy is proper knowledge.
There is only one real remedy in law: knowledge.
Knowledge of the truth of law.
Knowledge of the true concepts of law.
If you’re not willing to read, think, or listen, then failure is inevitable—one way or another.
Yes, learning the law takes time. But for those facing an urgent legal threat, the common excuse is: “I don’t have time—I need an answer now.” This fear is exactly what drives people to fall for quick-fix solutions that often make things worse, not better.
But here’s the truth: The idea that learning the law takes too much time is a complete lie.
In just 144 carefully chosen articles, phrases, and sentences, you will gain more real legal knowledge than you would from a thousand pages of seminar handouts. You could spend hundreds of thousands on courses and so-called “remedies” and still not learn what is freely available here.
So, let me make it clear:
This information is invaluable—and it proves that the excuse of “no time to learn” is simply false.
The 144 Truths of Law
1. Let all who have ears hear; Lets all who have eyes see;
2. That we here present come to be as One;
3. To honor the true Rule of Law;
4. To protect the Rule of Law and Justice and Due Process;
5. To defend the memory and legacy of our ancestors and founders;
6. And to restore the Rule of Law where it has been taken from us.
7. Therefore, let all who come before the people,
8. And all who seek to engage or transact or bring issue to us,
9. Know then that this be our Creed and our Confession,
10. Whereby we shall resolve any and all controversy of Law,
11. And whereby we shall serve with integrity the needs of our community:
12. There is, there was, there has only ever been One Law.
13. All law is equal that no one is above it,
14. All law is measured that all may learn and know it,
15. All law is standard that it may always be applied the same.
16. A law is a rule that prohibits or permits certain acts.
17. A rule is a norm, bar, maxim, measure or standard.
18. A rule may be derived by instruction, discovery, custom or consent.
19. The highest law is Divine being a rule given by divine instruction,
20. As nothing may contradict such a rule.
21. The second highest law be the reason of Mind,
22. Being an edict given by a great council of wise elders or jurists,
23. As nothing absurd and without good reason may be considered law.
24. The third highest law be the law of the people,
25. As the consent and will of the people is the source of true authority.
26. The weakest rule is that of a tyrant,
27. As any rule without authority or right of heaven but merely by force,
28. Cannot be sustained and the people shall eventually overcome,
29. And render such unjust rule and unjust laws as dust.
30. This be the law of all great civilizations from the beginning of time,
31. And no king or assembly or city has sustained in ignorance to such foundation.
32. These then be the foundations of Rule of Law:
33. All law be spoken as it is the spirit of the word that carries the authority.
34. Therefore all action under law be by word of mouth,
35. And writing be only for memory and trade and never be the law.
36. All are equal under the law,
37. All are accountable and answerable under the law,
38. All are without blemish until proven culpable,
39. Where there is a law there must be a cause,
40. Where there is a law there must be a penalty,
41. Where there is a law there must be a remedy.
42. An action in law cannot proceed without first a cause.
43. An action is not granted to one who is not injured.
44. The action of a valid law can do no harm (injury).
45. An action decided in law must reflect cause of such action.
46. No injury to the law means no valid cause for action by law.
47. No action through law can arise from a fraud before heaven and earth.
48. No action through law can arise in bad faith or prejudice.
49. An act does not make one culpable unless there be intent to do wrong,
50. For no one may suffer punishment by valid law for mere intent.
51. No one is punished for the transgression of an ancestor or another.
52. No one can derive an advantage in law from his own wrong,
53. For what is invalid from the beginning does not become valid over time.
54. No one is accused of the same exact cause twice.
55. No man be a judge over his own matter,
56. Nor a man possess the authority of heaven to be both judge and executioner.
57. No penalty may exist without a valid law.
58. The immediate cause and not the remote cause be the subject of law.
59. These be the foundations of Rule of Law.
60. As to justice it be the maxim that Justice never contradicts the rule of law,
61. For Justice be the lawful right of use of all that has been defined by law,
62. And Justice be the rights to adjudicate the law itself before heaven and earth,
63. And Justice be a judge under sacred oath and trust granted such rights,
64. As a right being a power or authority or privilege or benefit recognized by law.
65. Divine Law is the law that defines the Divine and all creation,
66. And demonstrates the spirit and mind and instruction of the Divine,
67. And the operation of the will of the Divine Creator through existence.
68. Therefore all valid rights and Justice is derived from Divine Law.
69. Natural Law is the law that defines the operation of the will of the Divine,
70. Through the existence of form and sky and earth and physical rules.
71. Thus Natural Law governs the operation of what we can see and name.
72. The laws of People are those rules enacted by men having proper authority,
73. For the good governance of a society under the Rule of Law.
74. The laws of People are always inherited from Natural Law.
75. A law of People cannot abrogate or usurp a Natural Law,
76. Nor is it possible for a Natural Law to usurp Divine Law.
77. These then be the foundations of Justice:
78. All possess the Right to be heard even if such speech be controversial,
79. All possess the Right of free will to choose our actions and destiny,
80. All possess the Right of reason that distinguishes them from lesser animals,
81. All possess the Right to informed consent or withdraw consent,
82. All possess the Right over their body that none may claim our flesh,
83. All possess the Right of our divine self that none may claim our soul.
84. Thus no man can make a blood oath on their flesh or vow on their soul,
85. Nor may any man claim servitude or obligation under such an abomination,
86. For such Rights are granted solely by heaven to all people,
87. And no man or body of jurists have the authority to usurp heaven or the gods.
88. Verily all true authority and power to rule is inherited from heaven,
89. And to only those men in good faith and good character and good conscience,
90. Who then make a sacred oath in trust and form an office,
91. Into which such Divine Rights are conveyed for only so long,
92. As they honor their oath and obligations to serve the people.
93. For whenever a man who makes an oath to form a sacred trust of office,
94. Then breaks such an oath through prejudice or unclean hands or bad faith,
95. Then all such authority and power ceases from them,
96. As the cord between heaven and earth is severed and the trust dissolved.
97. Verily no man may serve the people unless under sacred oath,
98. Nor may any man serve heaven unless under solemn vow.
99. Therefore guard your behaviour and actions of office,
100. That though the heavens appear to fall, let justice always be done.
101. These be the foundations of Justice.
102. As to the administration of Justice these be the foundations of Due Process:
103. No valid action in law proceeds without first a valid cause,
104. And no valid cause exists until such claim is first tested.
105. Thus the birth of all action in law must begin with the claim.
106. If a claim be not proven as a valid cause then the accused has nothing to answer.
107. Yet if the claim be proved to have merit as a cause,
108. Then all valid causes in law must be resolved.
109. Thus, he who first brings the claim must first prove its merit,
110. As the burden of the proof lies upon him who accuses not he who denies.
111. A heavy obligation then on one who first brings the controversy.
112. For one who brings false accusation is the gravest of transgressors,
113. That it injures not one law, but all heaven and all law.
114. Thus a valid claim in part is one in which an accuser makes a complaint,
115. Bringing two witnesses as proof and petitions a forum of law for remedy.
116. If merit of a cause be proved, the one accused must appear to answer.
117. The one accused and any witnesses appear by summons.
118. When anyone be summonsed, he must immediately appear without hesitation.
119. If a man summonsed does not appear or refuses to appear to answer,
120. Then let him be seized by force to come and attend.
121. When anyone who has been summonsed seeks to evade, or attempts to flee,
122. Let the one who summons lay hands on them to prevent their escape.
123. One who flees fair judgment confesses his culpability.
124. The accused cannot be judged until after the accusations be spoken,
125. And then after the accused exercises or declines their three rights to defense,
126. The first being Prolocution and the right to speak as a matter of law,
127. And why the complaint and investigation should not continue,
128. The second being Collocution as to why the complaint and accusation is false,
129. And upon such proof why the burden should now be placed on the accuser,
130. And the third being Adlocution being a final speech in defense,
131. Against a complaint or accusation having been heard.
132. If illness or old age hinder the appearance of the one summonsed,
133. Let the one who made the summons provide a basic means of transport.
134. When men wish to settle their dispute among themselves,
135. Then they shall have the right to make peace.
136. If a dispute cannot be settled before seeking a judge,
137. Then both the accused and the accuser must be granted equal hearing.
138. An accused cannot be found culpable unless three pieces of evidence may be attributed.
139. Judges are bound to explain the reason of their judgment.
140. The setting of the sun shall be the extreme limit of time within,
141. Which a judge must render his decision.
142. These be the foundations of Due Process.
143. These be the foundations of Rule of Law and Justice.
144. Any law that is against such truth, cannot be law.
From Knowledge to Action
So, the next question is: How do you translate this knowledge into practical steps when dealing with a Western-Roman court of law or an official?
That is exactly what we will be covering in the rest of this series. Understanding the law is just the beginning—applying it effectively is what truly matters. Stay with me as we break it down into clear, actionable steps.